After the attack - terror insurance a necessity?
For the last few days, the entire country has been glued to images of the horrifying images of the Mumbai riots on TV. We have debated the issue from every possible angle – political, social, religious, from the point of view of bilateral relations, international relations, and crass though it may sound in the light of the lives lost, from the economic angle too.
One initial estimate put the loss to the Taj Mahal Hotel alone at Rs 4000 crore, while loss to businesses in all of Mumbai could be in the range of Rs 50,000 crore, according to news reports. Some industries face direct losses – the tourism industry for instance. The holiday season next month, will definitely not be a time for cheer this year. Business plans and investments from foreign partners are likely to be put off if not cancelled, given that various countries have issued travel advisories, warning against travel to India. Foreign business partners may put off travel, and perhaps even investment, at least until the dust settles (One cold comfort is that there wasn’t too much room for the stock markets to drop further. The current economic conditions had already pulled the stock market to the depths).
Many see the attack on the business capital of Mumbai as actually being a direct attack on the Indian economy. Russia has observed some sort of pattern in the way terrorists have been targeting the emerging BRIC (Brazil, Russia, India and China) economies.
But for those of us trying to make a living in this country, the larger intent is not important. Terror attacks have unfortunately become a part of our lives, no matter which state we live in. And even personal economic stability is a big challenge in these uncertain times.
While the risk to life is certainly the most horrifying, there are others – risk to business and risk to property. And in both cases, one instrument that could help lessen the pain is insurance.
In fact, ever since 9/11 attacks in the US, terror insurance or risk cover for terror attacks came into focus. Terror insurance is not only for large corporates; small business people, media persons who are on the ground covering such attacks, as well as the common man – the biggest loser in terror attacks – are equal beneficiaries.
In India, we have had some kind of terror insurance – the IRDA has directed the creation of a terror pool which has been created where all general insurance companies pool the terrorism premium they have collected into a fund. The pool will fund claims with a limit of Rs 700 crore per location. So far not many demands have been made on this fund, but the latest attacks in Mumbai are very likely candidates to use this and affected hotel companies are reported to have taken risk cover for terrorism.
Most large corporates in the country have all taken some kind of liability cover, but terror cover is different, and requires an additional premium.
However, it is very difficult to predict or assess the risk associated with terror attacks. Secondly, in case of a claim, it can only be for covering losses directly caused by terror attacks (damage to property and possible business disruption), though the loss to the business may be far more. Experience has shown that companies buy low volumes and can never be fully prepared for the extent of the damage that can be caused.
Call it any name – terror cover or simple insurance, in today’s uncertain world, the instrument becomes even more important.
